Vehicle aerodynamics · Composite structures

Front Wing Design & Construction

A continuous main element and hollow carbon shells developed under my leadership to improve rigidity, durability, and mass.

2026 competition season · May 2025 — May 20262026 wing delivered

Overview

The 2026 Formula SAE front wing needed less mass and a stiffer, continuous main element while retaining cone-impact durability. I led the structural concept, tooling, composite manufacturing, and team training; Mathew Saffle performed the aerodynamic analysis and element placement, with mounting development shared with Kinsly Burelson. Hollow carbon shells around an aluminum main-element skeleton replaced the heavier foam-core approach. Teammate measurements indicated an approximately 10% front-wing mass reduction, and informal cone-contact and standing checks showed no obvious damage. Exact mass records and controlled structural tests remain unavailable; further aerodynamic development continues.

My Contribution

I proposed the continuous main element, hollow carbon shells, aluminum skeleton, and mechanically retained end ribs, and led the tooling and manufacturing process. I trained teammates and worked directly across fabrication while delegating tasks to build their capability. Mathew Saffle performed the aerodynamic simulations and element placement; Mathew and Kinsly Burelson developed the skeleton details. Mathew initiated the mounts and Kinsly finalized them.

Engineering Approach

The five-element front wing consists of one full-span main element and two downstream elements on each side of the nose. Only the main element contains the aluminum skeleton; printed inserts help distribute local loads, and the smaller elements use printed reinforcement. Bolts, close-fitting ribs, and rivets retain the main-element ends. Committing to molded hollow shells required building a manufacturing capability the section had not previously used.

Results & Current Status

The driver estimated a 0.3–0.4-second practice skidpad improvement with the complete aeropackage; timing records were not retained. This does not isolate the front wing’s contribution. Based on a teammate’s measurements, the 2026 front wing was approximately 10% lighter than the 2025 front wing; exact masses and the components included in the weighing are currently unavailable. The wing survived repeated cone-contact trials, and an informal 220 lb standing check showed no obvious damage. A controlled structural test record is unavailable.

Team Credits

Section leadership, initial structural concept, tooling and manufacturing lead: David Stout. Aerodynamic analysis and element placement: Mathew Saffle. Skeleton development: Mathew Saffle and Kinsly Burelson. Mounts: initial design by Mathew Saffle, finalized by Kinsly Burelson. Fabrication: the aerodynamics section.

Next Steps

  1. Improve low-Reynolds-number airfoil and multi-element performance through the next team’s analysis.
  2. Explore a lighter composite structure with ACI in Starkville.
  3. Record component masses and establish repeatable load and vehicle tests.

Supporting Files & Model

The supplied CAD export exposes the internal structure and selected shells. The vehicle photographs show the complete manufactured wing.

The STEP download provides CAD geometry for inspection, measurement, and section views. It does not include the original SolidWorks feature history or mates.

Browse the Model Library →

← Formula SAE projects